|
|
|
|
Post-tensioned Steel
Structure
The Need
|
Welded steel Moment-Resisting Frames (MRFs) were long considered
as one the most earthquake-resistant types of structures.
Numerous factors have contributed to the growth of this market
since the 1960s, especially in the Western United States were
they were extensively used prior to the 1994 Northridge
California earthquake. Four earthquakes in
California
and Japan (San Francisco, Kanto, Santa Barbara and Long Beach)
during the first part of this century gave engineers confidence
in this type of steel construction which enforced the
engineering communities preference for this
earthquake-resistant structural system. During these events,
there were typically fewer problems observed in steel structures
as compared with concrete and masonry buildings of similar size
and scale.
However, in the
1994 Northridge earthquake where more than 200 buildings of this
structural type suffered brittle fractures at connections. None
of these steel frame buildings collapsed, but the unexpected
type and severity of the damage raised serious questions about
the current practice in the design and construction of welded
MRFs. In the
Kobe, Japan Earthquake, which occurred exactly one year
later, damage to steel buildings was even more disturbing: 10%
of the steel buildings in
Kobe designed to current Japanese building standards
suffered extensive damage. Most of these observed fractures
occurred at the beam to column connections, and were usually
instigated at the level of the full penetration welds. |

The failure of the weld
between the tube and the connecting plate, as well as a fracture
of the tube, Northridge, CA, 1994
(Courtesy of NISEE, UC
Berkeley)
(Click on the picture for large one)

Fracture of steel connections
in a moment-resisting steel-frame building, Northridge, CA, 1994 |
The Technology
|
Recently, the
idea of applying the post-tensioning technology to achieve
moment resistant structural systems has been investigated at the
University of California, San Diego. Since 1996,
moment-resisting connections using post-tensioning concepts have
been developed and tested for precast concrete beam-to-column
connections, and concrete shear walls.
Professors Constantin Christopoulos’ (U of Toronto) and Andre
Filiatrault’s (UCSD) research has extended the self-centering
and energy dissipating connection systems to steel structures
using similar post-tensioning concepts. The post-tensioned
energy dissipating (PTED)
connection system for steel frames incorporates post-tensioned
high-strength bars to provide a self-centering response along
with energy dissipating bars that are able to develop stable
inelastic axial deformations in both axial tension and
compression. Numerical and experimental results presented show
that this connection is capable of achieving stiffness and
strength characteristics comparable to a traditional welded
moment-resisting connection. In addition, the connection can be
designed to provide a sufficient amount of energy dissipation
per cycle. In the experimental study, a cyclic component test
was performed on two energy dissipating bars and a cyclic test
was conducted on a large-scale exterior beam-to-column PTED
connection. The results of the tests show that the PTED test
specimen was able to undergo large inelastic deformations
without any damage in the beam or column and without residual
drift.
From a
constructability point of view, post-tensioned steel frames are
likely to be faster to erect than an equivalent welded MRFs because
they do not require any full penetration welds. The cost of
these systems is also expected to be similar to welded MRFs,
since only traditional and readily available materials are used
for the PTED frames. |

PTED Concept
(Click on the figure for
large one)

PTED Conncection at 3% Drift
(Click on the figure for
large one) |
The Benefits
|
The PTED system offers an alternative to traditional welded MRFs.
While the architectural features and their response to service
loads of both systems are similar, the PTED system has a highly
enhanced response to severe seismic loads, as it limits
structural damage to sacrificial bars and assures a full
re-centering of the structure at the end of the earthquake. |
Status
|
Experimental and analytical work carried out since 1999 has
shown that the PTED system is a viable alternative to welded
MRFs. Current research efforts are focused on determining the
response of these systems when the floor slab and gravity loads
are also present during the seismic loading. Additional work is
also being carried out to fully assess the dynamic response of
systems exhibiting the self-centering hysteresis. |
Barriers
|
The lack of the
real-world case where the post-tensioned steel structure
technology was applied may be a major obstacle. Although the
results of the research shows that this technology achieves
many strong characteristics for earthquake resistance, there
is not enough information how it would work on everyday
environments and how it should be applied to actual design
such as response to wind, interior design, and fire
consideration, etc. |
Points of Contact
- Dr. Andre Filiatrault. Professor,
Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of Calif., San Diego,
9500
Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093
Email:
afiliatrault@ucsd.edu
Phone: (858) 822 - 2161 Fax: (858) 822 - 2260
- Dr. Constantin Christopoulos.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto,
35 St. George Street, Toronto, ON. Canada M5S 1A4
Email:
cchristo@ecf.utoronto.ca
Phone: (416) 978 - 6238 Fax: (416) 978 - 7046
References
- Christopoulos, C. et Al. (2002).
"Post-tensioned Energy Dissipating Connections for
Moment-resisting Steel Frames" Journal of Structural
Engineering 128(9), 1111-1120.
- Christopoulos, C., Filiatrault, A. and Uang, C.-M.
(2002). "Self-Centering Post-tensioned Energy Dissipating (PTED)
Steel Frames for Seismic Regions" SSRP Report No. 2002/06,
University
of California, San Diego.
- Article "Post-tensioned Steel
Buildings May Replace Moment Frames" ENR, April 15, 2002
- National Information Service for
Earthquake Engineering (NISEE), University of California, Berkeley
Web site
http://nisee.berkeley.edu/
Disclaimer Statement
|
Neither the Construction
Industry Institute nor Purdue University in any way endorses this
technology or represents
that the information presented can be relied upon without further investigation. |
JK31
|