Full Report

A study performed by the British Cement Association produced the article,
Economic Assembly of Reinforcement
Bennet, D. and MacDonald, L.

1. Flat Slabs

The trial bay simulated a 26ft x 20ft internal panel of a 11in thick flat floor slab for a six-story building. The floor was designed to take a typical imposed office loading of 100 psf , plus self weight.

Trials were carried out using

  • A traditional loose bar layout
  • A hand-laid mat layout using single-directional mats
  • A crane-handled mat layout using two-directional mats

Crane:
18 ton capacity mobile crane with a jib height of 121ft and a maximum horizontal reach of 72ft when carrying a one ton load.

Prior to the trials, the bay area was marked out and column starter bars drilled into concrete base at the column positions. The reinforcement for all the speed trials was stored in a designated area outside the footprint of the mock building, with the crane positioned centrally.

Work was “theoretically” carried out at level 5, some 49ft above ground level, by hoisting reinforcement from the storage area to a height of 59ft before landing it in the work area.

Strictly regulated working hours:
Start 8:30
Break 10:00 – 10:15 am
Lunch 12:30 – 1:30 pm
Break 3:00 – 3:15 pm
End at completion, but no later than 6:30 pm

The time was noted at the start of operations, with the laying of spacer strips. Work was considered complete when the last bar was fixed in position and shear links placed over the column supports.

a. Rebar Trial:
The crane was used to pick up reinforcement bundles from the storage area and place them near to the working zone. The time trial commenced after a dummy run to familiarize the team with the identification and handling, so that the recorded trial run represents an efficient working cycle.

Work sequence:

  1. Cover spacer strips for the bottom reinforcement layer were laid out uniformly over the area.
  2. A single bar for the 26ft span was positioned and spacings for similar bars chalked out.
  3. Bottom layer bars were identified in the reinforcement bundles and laid out to the chalk marked spacings.
  4. A single bar in the opposite (20ft span) direction was positioned and the centers for the top layer of the bottom reinforcement chalked out.
  5. The remaining bottom bars were located and fixed in position.
  6. The bottom bars were tied at every other crossover to keep the assembly rigid.
  7. Steel chairs to support the top reinforcement were placed over the area and tied to the bottom reinforcement.
  8. Bars for the lower layer of top reinforcement were identified, their positions chalked out, and the bars placed and tied. Bars for the upper layer were then extracted from the reinforcement bundles and positioned to finish the top reinforcement.
  9. Loose bars were threaded through to complete the reinforcement over the columns.
  10. All top bars were tied at every other crossover to fix the assembly.
  11. The shear links were sleeved-in and tied.

Results:
Fixing the loose bar reinforcement started at 8:30am and was completed at 3:45pm , when the last shear link was in position. Over this period 298 single bars were fixed with a total weight of 1.8 tons. This required 5.75 hours.

b. Single Direction Mat:
For the second trial on the flat slab, traditional reinforcement was replaced by single-directional fabric mats, light enough to be manhandled. The sizes were approximate varying from 30ft x 10ft down to 10ft x 6.5ft. Each mat at the main reinforcement running in one direction, with traverse wires welded on to keep the assembly rigid. A second mat was overlaid at right angles to provide the main reinforcement in the other direction.

All mats were machine-fabricated and scheduled in accordance with sheet size, using standard dimensions. Loose bars were used for continuity over the columns and for shear links. The mats were stacked in the designated storage area and lifted by crane to the working area, with the bottom and top mats arranged in the required order for handling.

Work sequence:

  1. Cover spacer strips for the bottom mats were laid out uniformly over the area.
  2. Bottom mats in the longitudinal direction (26ft span) were located and placed in position by hand. Four mats were laid.
  3. Bottom mats in the transverse direction (20ft. span) were laid over the first layer and the two bottom mats tied together.
  4. Steel chairs to support the top reinforcement were positioned.
  5. The first layer of top mats was placed over the support chairs in the 26ft direction.
  6. The remaining top mats were positioned and tied down to secure both layers.
  7. Single bars were fixed over the column supports to provide continuity steel, and shear links positioned to complete the assembly.

Results:
The trial commenced at 8:30 am and finished at 10:00am , when the last shear link was fixed. In all, 40 reinforcement mats were fixed, with a total weight of 2.0 tons. The time required was 1.5 hours.

c. Two Directional Mat:
For the third trial, two-directional fabric reinforcement mats were substituted for the single-directional mats. The mats were prefabricated in the largest possible sizes, limited only by the dimensions of the transport and the crane capacity. The reinforcement for the bottom layer was fabricated in three mats, each 29.5ft x 10ft and the top layer was fabricated in four mats, two of 29.5ft x 10ft and two of 20ft x 10ft. Reinforcement over and around the columns was provided by loose bars, as were the shear links.

The two-directional mats were stacked in the designated storage area and lifted by crane directly into position.

Working sequence:

  1. Cover spacer strips for the bottom mats were laid uniformly over the 26ft x 20ft bay area.
  2. One mat for the bottom reinforcement was craned directly into position within the area. The remaining two mats were craned in together. The lower mat was unhooked in position, then the upper mat was craned into place.
  3. Steel spacer chairs were laid over the bottom mats and secured before landing the top reinforcement mats.
  4. The two 29.5ft x 10ft mats of top reinforcement were craned in together. The lower mat was unhooked before the crane lifted the top mat into position on the opposite side of the bay.
  5. The two smaller top mats, running in the 20ft direction, were then craned into position.
  6. A minimum amount of tying was carried out to secure the mats to the support chairs. The weight of the mats was sufficient to keep the assembly rigidly in place.
  7. Continuity reinforcement, using loose bars, was positioned over the four columns and shear links were inserted and tied.

 

Results:
The trial commenced at 12:15 pm and by 12:45 pm the last mast for the top reinforcement was in position. By 12:51 all the shear links and continuity reinforcement over the column positions had been fixed. Seven mats were fixed with a total weight of 2.2 tons. The time required was 0.5 hours.

 

 

2. Beam Cage

Traditional beam care using loose bars
A 26.25ft long beam cage, having four #8 bottom bars, two #5 top bars and links to shape code 61 at 11.8in centers, was assembled traditionally.

The bottom bars were hung between trestles and the shear links fed through and tied before the top two bars were fixed into position.

Total time taken for assembly was 20 minutes.

Fabric link beam cage
The 26.25ft long beam cage consisted of two sets of open-top fabric links, each 13.12ft in length. It was support on trestles and the bottom #8 bars fed through and tied. The open-top links were closed with a capping link to allow sleeving of the top reinforcement over the column positioned. The assembly was then turned over and the remaining #5 bar fed through and tied to complete fabrication.

Total time taken for completion was 10 minutes.

 

Conclusion
For the flat slabs, the steel installation times ranged from 5.75 hours for rebar, 1.5 hours for one direction mats, and 0.5 hours for two direction mats.
Beam cages were also assembled much quicker with WWR. For both cases, WWR installed in half the time.